What Is a Stock?
How ownership works, why prices move, how dividends work, and how individual stocks differ from index funds.
Read the stock guide
Market capitalization, or market cap, is just the price of one share multiplied by how many shares exist. That single number sorts every public company into a size tier, from micro-cap up to mega-cap, and that tier says a lot about how bumpy the stock is likely to be. It says nothing about whether the company is a good one.
Company size shapes our own portfolio lineup more directly than almost anything else we write about. Here is how the tiers work, and where each of our three model portfolios sits on that spectrum.
Share price times shares outstanding. Nothing more.
Market capitalization is what the stock market currently says a company is worth: its share price multiplied by the number of shares it has outstanding. A company trading at $50 a share with 2 billion shares out is worth $100 billion, full stop, whether or not $100 billion feels right to you.
That number is not the same thing as the company's assets, its revenue, or its cash in the bank. Two companies can post the same annual revenue and have wildly different market caps, because the market is pricing in different expectations about how fast each one will grow, how profitable it will become, and how much risk sits between here and there. Market cap is a price tag set by whoever traded the stock last, not an audited measure of what the business owns.
It also moves every day. A stock that closes 5% higher just added 5% to the company's market cap overnight, with no change to the underlying business at all. That is worth remembering any time you see a company's size quoted as though it were a fixed, permanent fact.
The reason market cap matters to you as an investor is simpler than any of that: it is the most common way the market sorts companies into size tiers, and those tiers correlate with how a stock tends to behave.
The dollar ranges vary by source. The order and the general idea do not.
Micro-cap covers roughly $50 million to $300 million. These are small, often young or thinly followed companies. Shares can be hard to buy or sell in size without moving the price, a problem called low liquidity, and many micro-cap companies never grow beyond this tier. Some fail outright.
Small-cap runs roughly $300 million to $2 billion. Still early in their growth story relative to the market as a whole, with real resources but a lot left to prove. Small-cap stocks tend to swing harder than the broad market in both directions.
Mid-cap spans roughly $2 billion to $10 billion. Established enough to have survived a full business cycle, not yet dominant in their industry. Often described as a middle ground between growth potential and stability, though "middle" still means real volatility.
Large-cap runs roughly $10 billion to $200 billion. Most household-name companies live here: established businesses with years or decades of operating history, broad analyst coverage, and shares that trade easily in large volume.
Mega-cap covers roughly $200 billion and up. A small handful of the largest public companies in the world, each one a substantial fraction of most major stock indexes on its own. Even at this size, a mega-cap company is not exempt from a severe stock decline if its business or its industry runs into serious trouble.
None of these ranges are official. Different data providers draw the lines in slightly different places, and a company sitting near a boundary might get classified differently depending on who is doing the counting. Treat the tiers as a rough map, not a legal definition.
Smaller companies tend to swing harder. There are real reasons why.
A large or mega-cap company usually has more revenue streams, more geographic diversification, and more cash reserves to absorb a bad quarter. One weak product line rarely sinks the whole business. A micro-cap or small-cap company often depends on a handful of customers, a single product, or one region, so a single setback can hit the stock much harder.
Smaller companies also get less attention. Fewer analysts cover them, fewer institutions hold them, and fewer shares change hands on a typical day. That thinner trading means prices can move sharply on relatively small amounts of buying or selling, and it can be harder to sell a large position quickly without accepting a worse price. Larger companies do not have this problem to nearly the same degree.
None of this means small companies are bad investments or large companies are good ones. It means the range of likely outcomes is wider at the small end of the spectrum and narrower at the large end. A micro-cap stock can double in a year. It can also go to zero. A mega-cap stock rarely does either, though a severe decline is still possible if the business itself deteriorates.
Size is one input into risk, not the whole picture. A large company with too much debt can still be riskier than a well-run small one. But averaged across hundreds of companies, size and volatility correlate closely enough that professional portfolios are built around it on purpose, ours included.
Focused portfolio management with a human adviser
Narstar manages three model portfolios for different goals and risk tolerances, with direct access to the adviser making the decisions. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Each model portfolio deliberately occupies a different part of the size spectrum.
We built our three model portfolios around this exact spectrum on purpose, not by accident. Income holds larger, more established dividend-paying companies selected for cash flow, generally toward the large-cap and mega-cap end of the range. Larger, more established businesses are more likely to sustain a dividend, but dividends are never guaranteed. A company's board can cut or suspend a dividend at any time, regardless of size.
Growth also leans toward established, large-cap companies, chosen for durable competitive advantages meant to compound over long periods. That focus on established businesses does not remove the risk of extended stretches of underperformance, including in sectors like technology where growth expectations can run ahead of results.
Speculative sits at the other end entirely: a small number of concentrated positions in smaller, more volatile companies, generally in the small-cap and micro-cap range. This portfolio seeks higher returns by accepting that wider range of outcomes directly. Seeking them is not the same as getting them, and this concentration can produce declines of 30 to 40% or more. That is a realistic outcome here, not a footnote.
You do not pick a cap size yourself. You answer a short questionnaire about your goals and how much loss you could stomach, and we match you to one portfolio, or a mix of the three, based on that answer. The cap-size tilt is a consequence of the strategy, not something we ask you to choose directly.
A few questions worth asking about any stock or fund before you look at anything else.
Start by asking what cap size you are actually holding, not just what the fund or portfolio is named. A fund called "growth" can hold mostly mega-cap companies or mostly small-cap ones depending on how it is built, and the two versions carry very different risk. Read the fund's stated holdings or ask the manager directly rather than assuming from the label.
Next, ask how that fits with everything else you already own. A portfolio that is entirely mega-cap is missing exposure to smaller companies that may grow faster. A portfolio that is entirely micro-cap is carrying concentration risk most people are not prepared for. Most durable portfolios blend tiers deliberately rather than defaulting to whichever tier happens to be popular that year.
Finally, be honest about your own time horizon and stomach for volatility. Smaller-cap positions can take years to play out, and they can lose a meaningful chunk of their value before, if ever, recovering. Money you might need in the next year or two generally does not belong at the small end of this spectrum, no matter how compelling the story behind a particular company sounds.
Three model portfolios, each occupying a different part of the size spectrum.
All three Narstar portfolios hold individual stocks, not funds, and each one has its own cap-size tilt, its own fee, and its own risk level. You reach out, we send a short questionnaire about your goals, your timeline, and how you would handle a big loss. Based on your answers, we match you to one portfolio, or a mix of the three. We manage it with discretionary authority, meaning we make the trades without asking you first each time. Everything sits in your own account at Interactive Brokers, where your assets are covered by SIPC (opens in new tab), up to $500,000, plus $30 million in extra coverage through IBKR. SIPC covers you if the broker fails. It does not cover you if your investments lose value.
For regular taxable accounts, Income charges 0.60% a year and holds larger, dividend-paying companies selected for cash flow. Growth charges 1.20% and holds larger companies with durable competitive advantages. Speculative charges 1.60% and holds a small number of smaller, more volatile companies. Traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP, and SIMPLE IRA accounts are all charged a uniform 1.00% a year regardless of model portfolio mix. We bill advisory fees quarterly in arrears, and Interactive Brokers may charge its own separate trading fees on top.
All three carry real risk regardless of cap size. Dividends are never guaranteed. Large companies can still decline. Losses in Speculative can be severe. These portfolios are not guaranteed to produce any particular outcome, and past decisions do not predict future results.
The standard minimum is $3,000 per Model Portfolio in a non-retirement account, and $3,000 per account in a Traditional, Roth, or SEP IRA, where one account can hold more than one model portfolio. A new client may open one $100 Starter Account, which must reach $3,000 by the last day of the sixth calendar month after opening. SIMPLE IRA participant accounts have a $0 minimum and are not eligible for the Starter Account. Our homepage fee calculator estimates your Narstar advisory fee at any balance. Interactive Brokers charges separate brokerage commissions and fees.
The beginner questions, answered without jargon.
Usually steadier, not automatically safer. Large and mega-cap companies tend to have more resources, more established businesses, and stock prices that swing less on any given day. None of that makes a single large company immune to failure or a large-cap stock immune to a severe decline. Size is a rough guide to how bumpy the ride tends to be, not a guarantee of the outcome.
Because a smaller company has more room to grow than one that is already enormous, and some investors are willing to accept sharper swings and a real chance of failure for a shot at that growth. It is a deliberate risk trade, not a shortcut. Smaller companies also fail more often, trade less, and can be harder to sell quickly at a fair price, so this end of the spectrum is not for money you might need soon.
Constantly. Market cap is share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it moves every time the stock trades. A company can cross from small-cap to mid-cap to large-cap over years of growth, or drop several tiers during a bad stretch. The tiers are a snapshot, not a fixed label glued to a company forever.
Depends on the model portfolio. Income and Growth generally hold larger, more established companies. Speculative holds a small number of smaller, more volatile companies. You get matched to one portfolio, or a mix, through a short questionnaire about your goals and how much loss you could stomach.
Questions about market cap, risk, or which portfolio fits your situation? Get in touch.